检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学财政系
出 处:《数量经济技术经济研究》2013年第10期19-34,共16页Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"农村地区非对称型的机理分析和农村财政制度设计"(70573086)的阶段性成果
摘 要:中国目前公共服务不平等的观察是常年累积的结果。本文尝试从增量的角度,分别运用基尼系数、广义熵指数测算户籍和常住两种口径下公共服务不平等程度,并进一步按"城市型、城乡型地区"、"经济发达、欠发达地区"子样本和按支出分项分解不平等。研究发现,目前公共服务增量供给不平等程度依然很高;户籍口径公共服务增量供给不平等远大于常住口径;两种子样本分解均揭示60%以上的总体不平等来源于组内;其他支出、教育、城乡社区事务、一般公共服务、社会保障和就业的不平等贡献率总和达到66.21%。From the perspective of incremental, estimating the Inequality of the public service by the Gini coefficient and the Generalized Entropy Index, this paper decomposes the inequality by elements of expenditure components, decomposes the inequality by the sub-sample of "city areas and urban-rural areas" and "economically developed and underdeveloped areas". According to the resultes the public service incremental supply inequality is still at high levels. The inequality in the provision of public services caused by the household population is much larger than the resident population. Two kinds of sub-sample decomposition reveals that more than 60% of the overall inequality comes from within-the-group. The sum inequality contribution rate of other expenses, the education, the urban and rural community affairs, the general public services, the social security and employment, reaches 66.21N.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166