检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《大学图书馆学报》2013年第5期101-105,共5页Journal of Academic Libraries
摘 要:对比分析了虚拟专用网(VPN)与代理服务两种技术实现方式的优劣,认为在没有较高保密要求的情况下,从满足校外访问功能需求角度出发,图书馆应选择代理服务方式。进而深入分析代理服务的主流产品,提出根据高校师生的资源使用情况和图书馆技术实力选择软件产品的具体建议,并给出了系统网络环境的最优构建方式。指出我国高校应积极参与共享资源的机构成员认证和授权体系的建设,以从根本上解决高校用户合理使用需求与数据库授权之间矛盾。This paper compares the pros and cons of the two technical implementation methods, Virtual Private Network (VPN) and the proxy service. The authors believe that libraries without high-confidentiality requirements should select proxy service to meet the demand of off-campus access, then analyze the mainstream products of proxy service and put forward specific proposals for selecting software based on the usage of digital resource and the technical ability of each library. The optimal way to build network environment for off-campus access system is also proposed. The article points out that academic libraries should actively participate in the construction of organization membership authentication and the entire authoriza- tion system, in order to fundamentally solve the contradiction between users' reasonable usage demand and the authorization limits exerted by database providers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28