“承认”问题的新论域——弗雷泽与孔普雷迪斯关于“承认”的政治哲学对话  

New Discourse Space of the “Recognition”:A Political-Philosophical Exchange on Recognition between Fraser and Kompridis

作　　者：靳志强[1] 王四达[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学公共管理学院,泉州262021

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期79-85,157,共7页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：福建省社会科学规划重点项目"英美新马克思主义的‘重建历史唯物主义’研究"(项目批准号:2009A003)阶段性成果;华侨大学政治学学科重点建设项目经费资助

摘　　要：法兰克福学派第三代批判理论家南茜·弗雷泽和尼古拉斯·孔普雷迪斯曾围绕何种"承认"方能为社会批判理论注入活泉、并有效反对资本主义各种不平等展开了一场政治哲学论辩。弗雷泽认为"参与平等"是正义的社会批判理论的规范基础,"承认"的首要优点是正义,所以"承认"是正义理论不可或缺的一个重要维度。而在孔普雷迪斯看来,"承认"的实质是"自由",他号召我们不仅要思考"承认"的积极意义,还要思考"承认"的局限性。两者的承认构想之异同及其争辩所打开的话语空间丰富和发展了资本主义社会的总体性批判理论,反映了继霍耐特提出"承认一元论"后批判理论界的最新演进动向。Nancy Fraser and Nikolas Kompridis,two critical theorists of the third generation of Frankfurt School,launched a political-philosophical argument on what kind of'recognition'can pour fountain into social critical theory and promote contemporary anti-capitalist movement effectively.Fraser believes that 'participatory equity'is the standard basis of justice critical theory and that the primary advantage of 'recognition'is justice,so 'recognition'is an indispensable dimension of justice theory.But in Kompridis' eyes,the essence of'recognition'is'freedom'and he calls us not only to think the positive meaning of 'recognition'but also to think its limitation.The similarity and the differences between the two 'recognitions,'and the discourse space opened by their debate,enriched and developed the general critical theory in capitalist society,and reflected the newest evolution trend after Honneth's 'recognition monism.'

关 键 词：弗雷泽 孔普雷迪斯 承认 社会批判理论 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]