检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱奇[1] 殷濛濛[1] 何美琪[1] 杨玉环[1]
出 处:《现代预防医学》2013年第19期3565-3568,共4页Modern Preventive Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学青年基金(21107054)
摘 要:目的了解南通市区居民食品安全相关行为现状,为采取进一步的宣教干预提供依据。方法自行设计《食品安全行为调查问卷》,采用现场拦截抽样调查的方法对南通市区290名居民进行问卷调查,随后计算每一道题的应答率和构成比,并对不同性别、年龄和学历组间采用构成比χ2检验比较。结果南通市区居民在食品安全行为中存在一些问题,例如:购买到劣质食品时,42.41%的人自认倒霉,不再追究;38.62%的居民无所谓就餐点有无卫生许可证;面对熟食工作人员不安全的卫生行为,34.14%的人有意见但不指出,还有13.45%的人表示无所谓。结论南通市区居民在遇到食品安全问题时维权意识还不高,并且在一些食品安全行为上存在不少问题。OBJECTIVE To investigate the food safety behavior among the urban residents in Nantong City, so as to provide scientific evidences for food safety education and development of policies about food safety. METHODS The questionnaire was designed by ourselves and then the random field interception sampling was carried out among 290 urban residents in Nan- tong City. The data were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test between different gender, age and education by Stata 8.0. RESULTS There were some problems about food safety behavior among the urban residents in Nantong City, for example: there were 42.41% people accepted that they had bad luck when bought the food of poor quality but didn't find out the re- sponsibility; 38.62% people didn't care whether there were health license where they dined. 34.14% people had dissatisfac- tion but didn't point out, and 13.45% people did not matter when they confronted the delicatessen worker without health be- haviors. CONCLUSION The urban residents in Nantong City do not have a strong awareness of safeguard the rights when they meet the food safety problem. And they also have some problems in food health behaviors.
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.145.38