检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈琴[1] 余成民[1] 李玲佳[1] 李薇[1] 李正发[1] 刘国清[1] 蔡捷[1]
机构地区:[1]南充精神卫生中心,637000
出 处:《四川精神卫生》2013年第3期177-181,共5页Sichuan Mental Health
摘 要:目的了解农村特殊家庭留守儿童自我意识和家庭环境状况及其关系。方法采用Piers-Harris儿童自我意识量表(CSCS)、家庭环境量表(FES-CV)对用分层随机抽样方法抽取的南充市阆中金城中心小学校四到六年级的203名在校学生的自我意识水平和家庭环境状况进行调查。结果①特殊家庭留守儿童(A组)49人,一般家庭留守儿童(B组)79人,非留守儿童(C组)75人;②A组儿童的行为、合群、幸福满足感因子得分均低于非留守儿童(P<0.05);③方差分析显示,除焦虑因子分外,六年级特殊家庭留守儿童自我意识总分、身体、幸福因子分均高于四、五年级(P<0.05);A组儿童的亲密度、情感表达、独立性、娱乐性、文化性、道德宗教因子分均低于C组,而矛盾因子分高于B、C两组(P<0.01);④相关分析显示,家庭环境亲密度、情感表达、文化性、娱乐性、道德宗教和组织性6个因子分与CSCS总分、行为、智力、躯体、焦虑、合群和幸福因子分呈正相关(r=0.11~0.40,P<0.05),矛盾性因子分与CSCS所有因子得分呈负相关(r=-0.31^-0.18,P<0.05),家庭环境独立性和控制性因子分与CSCS中的智力因子分呈正相关(r=0.09~0.11,P<0.05)。结论特殊家庭留守儿童的心理健康状况及家庭环境状况均较差,家庭环境状况可能是其心理健康水平的重要影响因素之一。Objective To understand the situation of self- awareness and family environment among special rural left -behind children and their relationship. Methods 203 pupils from the fourth to the sixth grade in Langzhong Nanchong City Jincheng center primary school were recruited in our study. The level of self - awareness and the situation of family environment were assessed by the children's self consciousness scale (Piers -Harris CSCS) ,family environment scale (FES -CV) respectively with stratified random sampling method. Results The number of left -behind children (group A) in special family was 49, while the number of left -behind children (group B) in average family was 79, and the number of non - left - behind children (group C) was 75 ; The scores of behavior, gregari- ousness, happiness and satisfaction in group A were lower than those among the non - left - behind children (P 〈 0.05 ) ; Analysis of vafiance showed that, in addition to the anxiety factor,the total scores of self consciousness and the scores of somatization,happiness factor in the special family left - behind children of the sixth grade were higher than the tburth and fifth grade (P 〈 0.05). The scores of intimacy, emotion expression, independence, entertainment, culture, moral and religious factor in group A were lower than those in group C, while the scores of contradictory factors were higher than group B, C (P 〈 0.01 ) .④Correlation analysis showed that, scores of the intimacy of family environment, emotional expression, culture, entertainment, religious morality and organization were positively correlated with the total scores of CSCS,scores of behavior, intelligence, body, anxiety, gregariousness and happiness factor (r =0. 11 -0. 40, P〈0.05), the scores of contradictory factor were negatively related to scores of all factors of CSCS(r = -0. 31 ~ -0. 18, P 〈0.05), scores of family environment of independent and control factor was positively correlated with intelligence factor of CSCS
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117