《文选》分文体为三十八类说辨正——《〈文选〉分体三种说论衡》之二  

On the Identifying of Opinion of 38 Categories of Literary Styles by Wen Xuan

作　　者：力之[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期111-118,共8页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目"<文选>成书考说"(10XZW010)之研究成果

摘　　要：《文选》分体既非三十七类,更不可能是三十八类,而只能是三十九类。对证明《文选》分类起关键作用者有二:《文选》序次作家的实际情形与《文选序》所说的"各以时代相次";相关版本上之标示。陈景云诸名家因未能就整体来考察部分,故虽知"移"而未能识"难"。《文苑英华》及《汉书·艺文志》的分类如何,这对研究《文选》原分多少体无实质性意义;据天津艺术博物馆与日本永青文库分别所藏的敦煌本《文选注》之"解",无法证明"难"非《文选》之一体。The number of literary styles divided by WenXuanis neither 37nor 38,but 39.There are two key proves：one is chronological order of authors,and the other is the signals in related versions.Famous scholars such as CHEN Jing-yun failed to look into the detail from the whole and thus found the＂yi＂but did not recognize＂nan＂.The classifications from the Wen Yuan Ying Hua and the Han Shu Yi Wen Zhi had no substantial help to the identification of categories of literary styles in Wen Xuan.Based on Dunhuang version of Wen Xuan Zhuin the Tianjin Museum of Art and in the Eisei Bunko Museum,＂nan＂cannot be excluded out of the categories of literary styles in Wen Xuan.

关 键 词：《文选》 分类 三十八类说 《文苑英华》 敦煌本《文选注》 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]