中国独生子女大学生性别角色特质分析  

Gender role traits among only-child college students

作　　者：贾凤芹[1,2] 刘电芝[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学心理学系,江苏215123 [2]苏州科技学院心理学系

出　　处：《中国学校卫生》2013年第8期943-944,948,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(08BSH052);教育部人文社科研究基金青年项目(11YJC880035);江苏省高校哲社项目(2012SJD880040)

摘　　要：目的了解独生子女大学生性别角色类型分布状况,为独生子女的性别教育提供科学依据。方法采用中国大学生性别角色量表(CSRI-50),对分层整群抽取的中国27所大学1 890名独生子女和3 097名非独生子女大学生进行调查。结果独生子女大学生未分化比例高于非独生子女,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。独生子女中,男大学生双性化比例高于女大学生;来自城市的大学生女性化比例高于来自农村的学生;担任过班干部的大学生未分化比例低,双性化比例高,差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。结论独生子女未分化比例高,性别角色发展存在较大偏差。民主型教养方式及社会实践有利于性别角色发展,而专制与溺爱的教养方式容易导致性别角色发展出现偏差。Objective To investigate the gender role traits among only-child college students,and to provide evidence for gender education.Methods A total of 1 890 only-child college students and 3 097 non-only-child college students were assessed with CSRI-50.Results The undifferentiated rates of only-child college students were significantly higher than that of non-onlychild college students（P0.01）.The androgyny rates of male only-child college students were significantly higher than that of female college students（P0.05）.The femininity rates of those from urban areas were significantly higher than that of those from rural areas（P0.05）.The androgyny rates in student leaders were significantly higher than that of normal students.The undifferentiated rates of only-child college students brought up with authority or spoiling were significantly higher than that of uncontrolled students（P0.01）.Conclusion There are substantial differences in gender role traits among only-child college students.Child rearing with democracy could help to the better development of gender role traits,while child rearing with authority or spoiling might result into the deviation of gender role development.

关 键 词：独生子女 学生 回归分析 精神卫生 角色扮演 

分 类 号：R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学] B844.2[医药卫生—医学心理学]