检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]济南医院,山东济南250013
出 处:《中国医学创新》2013年第27期149-150,共2页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的:探讨慢性糖尿病社区预防干预效果和价值。方法:选取2010年6月-2012年6月本服务站慢性糖尿病患者80例进行回顾性分析,随机分成观察组和对照组,每组40例,观察组进行社区预防干预,对照组采用常规血糖控制,观察两组干预效果。结果:两组治疗后空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 hPBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且观察组降低水平显著优于对照组(P<0.05);两组治疗后不良行为改善率和并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且观察组改善水平显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:对慢性糖尿病患者采取社区干预能够有效控制患者的血糖水平,改善患者的不良行为,减少并发症的发生,效果显著。Objective:To explore the chronic diabetes effect and value of community-based prevention interventions. Method:80 patients with chronic diabetes were analysed retrospectively in our service station from June 2010 to June 2012 . They were divided into observation group and control group randomly,40 cases in each group.The observation group used community intervention and the control group used conventional glucose control,and observed the nursing effect of the two groups. Result:After treatment,FBG,2 hPBG,HbA1c of two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.05),and the observation group decreased significantly than that of the control group(P<0.05);after treatment,the rate of bad behavior improved,and the incidence of complications of two groups were significantly improved(P<0.05),and the observation group improved significantly better than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion:Community-based interventions for chronic diabetes can effectively control the patient’s blood sugar level, improve the patient’s bad behavior,and reduce the incidence of complications,there is significant effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28