效力等同视角下的电子票据立法  

Electronic Bill Legislation fromthe View of the Effect Equivalence

作　　者：李遐桢[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学博士后流动站 [2]华北科技学院

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2013年第5期89-93,共5页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:<云计算技术条件下网络财产的发展趋势及保护规则研究>(项目编号:12BFX084)的中期研究成果

摘　　要：电子票据的本质属性是票据而非支付指令,效力等同是电子票据立法的原则,我国《票据法》应从功能等同、介质效力等同及电子签章与手书签章效力等同三个方面确定电子票据与传统票据效力等同原则。电子票据具有独特的融资功能,《票据法》应从修订立法宗旨、票据无因性以及延长票据期限三个方面保障电子票据融资功能的发挥。通过修订或扩大解释《票据法》的方式将电子票据纳入《票据法》的调整范围,立法者必须考虑《票据法》内在体系的科学性与合理性。The essential attribute of electronic bills is negotiable instrument rather than payment instruc- tion. Validity equivalence is the principles of electronic bill legislation, so Chinese negotiable instrument law should establish effect equivalent principle between electronic bill and negotiable instrument from three as- pects, func^ional equivalence, Medium effect equivalent and effect equivalence between electronic and hand- written signature. Electronic bill has a unique financing function. To make sure it can be functioned, negotiable instrument law should be revised from the legislative purposes, non causative nature and the bill deadline ex- tend these three aspects. Lawmakers must take the scientific nature and rationality of negotiable instrument law system into consideration when bringing the electronic bills into scope of negotiable instrument law by re- vising it or enlarging the interpretation.

关 键 词：电子票据 票据 效力等同 

分 类 号：D922.287[政治法律—经济法学] D923[政治法律—法学]