检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东海海洋》1991年第1期1-12,共12页Donghai Marine Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金
摘 要:Wilson方法和井岛方法均是移动风区上著名的波浪推算方法,被广泛应用于台风波浪的推算和预报上。本文通过分析指出:使用上述方法以海洋工程界所推行的风浪预报公式作台风浪推算时,所得特征波波陡将与台风浪实测波陡分布定性不符,并指出产生这种缺陷的原因。In this paper, an essential defect is described of Wilson's method in the calculation of typhoon wave. It is common knowledge that the equivalence of characteristic wave has to be applied repeatedly for calculating wind wave in the case of moving fetch. It is shown that for a kind of relationship, such as Wilson IV, Bretschneider and Rjeplinskii etc., the characteristic wave height and period increase with the fetch in the nondimensional form, but the characteristic wave steepness decreases with the nondimensional fetch. In this case, the equivalence will make the wave steepness lower further when the wave moves from a fetch with lighter wind speed to another with stronger wind speed. Thus, the wave shape calculated by Wilson' s method will became flatter. Evidently, it is not agree with the fact that the more close to the typhoon centre the wave is, the larger the wave steepness is. Ijvma' s method by fracing wave is similar to the Wilson' s, but for the former, the projection of wave height in the changed wind direction would be used in replace of the wave height before the equivalence in applied. If so, it will cause the wave steepness still lower than the Wilson's method. It is suggested that the calculation for typhoon wave is in urgent need of developing a kind of relationship suitable for the typhoon wave which should be consistent with the fact that the characteristic wave height period and wave steepness increase with the fetcb or of developing another method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158