检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江南大学商学院工商管理系,江苏无锡214122
出 处:《地域研究与开发》2013年第5期157-162,共6页Areal Research and Development
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(JUSRP10913);江苏省教育厅项目(2012SJD760043)
摘 要:以苏州、无锡、常州、镇江、南京的3批国家级非物质文化遗产为研究对象,构建针对非遗文化旅游开发潜力的三级指标评价体系,通过专家评估法与层次分析法测算指标权重,对各评价因子进行模糊打分得到各市的综合评价结果。五市的非物质文化遗产的文化旅游潜力集中于Ⅱ、Ⅲ等级,总体品位突出,开发潜力大。南京的民俗类、苏州传统美术与表演艺术类优势明显,无锡、常州、镇江三市整体相对薄弱。除少数项目与旅游有较好的结合,大多项目囿于专业市场,但有较大的文化旅游开发空间。最后结合具体项目分类别提出非遗文化旅游的开发策略。Taking the case of the national intangible cultural heritage of the 5 cities--Suzhou, Wuxi, Chang- zhou, Zhenjiang and Nanjing--located in the southern Jiangsu, the article constructed a three-class index system on measuring cultural tourism potential including 24 indexes of third grade, used the expert and AHP methods to deter- mine the index weight, and fuzzy measured the indexes on each sort of the five cities. The results indicated that the tourism potential concentrated on II and III grades with outstanding taste and wide development space, especially the folk-custom resources in Nanjing and traditional art and handcraft ones in Suzhou are relatively well developed, whereas the resources of Wuxi, Changzhou and Zhenjiang were some original. From the sort of view, most of the i- tems were limited in their own professional fields. Based on the analysis of the concrete intangible cultural heritage items, the paper advanced corresponding development strategy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.27