检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《法学杂志》2013年第10期119-127,共9页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:受封建生产关系、生产力水平等因素的限制,中国古代民众不可能具有现代法治意识并享有现代法治意义上的自由和权利。中国传统法律制度中固然不乏值得称道的部分内容,但是封建司法制度的使命在于维护封建集权的君主专制政权,不可能实行现代法治技术。封建君主专制所孕育的中国法文化传统与现代法治精神具有本质上的差异,中国传统法律制度在整体上应该被改造、被置换,但是其中与现代法治相适应的部分优秀法律文化应该被继承和吸收。Constrained by factors such as feudal productive relation and productivity level, ancient Chinese people could impossibly have modern consciousness of law and enjoy freedom and rights. Admittedly, traditional legal system has commendable partial content, but feudal judicial system is aimed at maintaining feudal centralized autocratic monarchy regime, and it is unlikely to implement modem rule of law. The legal culture tradition bred by feudal autocratic monarchy is essentially different from modem rule of law. And although the system of Chinese traditional law system should be transformed and replaced as a whole, the part which matches modem rule of law should be inherited and improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15