检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西财经大学信息管理学院,江西南昌330032 [2]江西财经大学经济学院,江西南昌330032
出 处:《当代财经》2013年第10期56-65,共10页Contemporary Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71063006);"赣鄱555工程"领军人才培养计划(赣组字[2011]64号);国家软科学项目(2012GXS4D089)
摘 要:利用基金重仓股季度持股和日持仓变动数据,从超额收益率、股价波动率和正反馈交易三个模型出发,对中国股指期货上市以来震荡市场下基金持股与市场稳定的关系进行分析,结果表明基金季度持股的高低并不能反映其在震荡市场下采取何种交易策略。进一步研究发现,基金在不同的市场环境中对市场的稳定作用不同,大跌时降低了市场当日的震荡,大涨时却加剧了股市的波动;平均而言,基金在整体上采取了正反馈交易策略。综合起来分析,基金并未起到稳定市场的作用。因此,不能简单地以基金对波动率的影响来衡量其与市场的稳定关系,需结合股价波浪运动的波动率和趋势影响两个维度进行新的解释。By using the data of quarterly holding of bulk-holding stocks and daily changes of fund holdings, this paper conducts an analysis of the relationship between fund holding and market stability in volatile markets since the listing of Stock Index Futures of China with the three models of excess return, stock price volatility and positive feedback trading. The result shows that the level of quarterly fund holding cannot reflect the trading strategy taken in the volatile markets. Further study finds that funds can play different stabilizing roles in different markets, reducing the market shock of the day when decreasing sharply and intensifying the market fluctuation when increasing sharply. On average, the positive feedback strategy is adopted for funds on the whole. Generally speaking, funds cannot play a role in stabilizing market. Therefore, the impact of fund on price volatility cannot be simply used to measure the stable relationship between it and the market; a new interpretation should be made from the two dimensions of the volatility and trend influence of the wave motion of stock prices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7