论紧急状态下的公正审判权保障——国际标准与中国实践  

On the Protection of the Right to a Fair Trail in a State of Emergency——International Standards and China's Practice

作　　者：宁立标[1] 翟林琳[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2013年第5期88-92,共5页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

基　　金：贵州省教育厅2010年人文社科研究课题"自然灾害时期的人权保障"(10JD09);贵州大学2009年人文社科专项课题"紧急状态下的公正审判权保障"

摘　　要：紧急状态下人权克减的直接目的是国家安全,但是其最终目的应是人权保障。虽然《公民权利与政治权利公约》并没有将第14条规定确立为不可克减的条款,但是国际人道法与国际人权法的相关规定表明,公正审判权并非可以随意克减的人权。中国虽然有关于紧急状态的法律规定,但是缺乏紧急状态下人权保障的具体规定。当前中国应制定紧急状态法,在该法中明确规定公正审判权的保障标准。In a state of emergency, human rights could be derogated for sake of the national security, but the guarantee of human rights should remain the ultimate purpose. Although the right to a fair trail isn＇t a non-derogable right according to ICCPR. both the international humanitarian law and international law of human rights regulate that this right can not be derogated randomly. In China, there＇re legislative stipulations on states of emergency, but the provisions of the right to a fair trial under the state of emergency are nonexistent. Therefore, it＇s imperative for China to enact the emergency law and clearly stipulate the guarantee standards for the right to a fair trial.

关 键 词：紧急状态 公正审判权 人权克减 人权保障 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]