检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北林业大学,哈尔滨150040
出 处:《东北林业大学学报》2013年第10期23-27,共5页Journal of Northeast Forestry University
基 金:"十二五"农村领域国家科技计划课题(2012BAD22B02023);林业公益性行业科研专项(201004043)
摘 要:对大兴安岭地区白桦低质林进行不同带宽的带状和不同面积的块状两种不同皆伐方式的改造后枯落物水文效应变化的研究。结果表明:带宽为6~18 m的皆伐带未分解层枯落物蓄积量所占比例均小于半分解层的枯落物蓄积量,面积为5 m×5 m^30 m×30 m的块状区域未分解层枯落物蓄积量所占比例和半分解层比较大小不一;枯落物蓄积量排序:带状皆伐8.67 t/hm2>块状皆伐4.41 t/hm2。每条带宽的皆伐带未分解层的最大持水量所占比例均小于半分解层的最大持水量,每个面积的块状区域未分解层的最大持水量所占比例和半分解层比较大小不一;枯落物最大持水量排序:块状皆伐35.44 t/hm2>带状皆伐14.23 t/hm2。每条皆伐带未分解层枯落物有效拦蓄量所占比例均小于半分解层的枯落物有效拦蓄量,每个面积的块状区域未分解层的有效拦蓄量所占比例和半分解层比较大小不一;枯落物有效拦蓄量排序:带状皆伐25.17 t/hm2>块状皆伐7.81 t/hm2。带状和块状皆伐方式下,枯落物持水量与浸泡时间的关系均呈现对数关系上升,而枯落物吸水速率与浸泡时间的关系均呈现乘幂关系下降。The experiment was conducted to study the hydrological ettect ot talhng object in Daxing" an Mountains ot torch cop pice low-quality forest in different bandwidth and different area by two different clear cuttings. The litter proportion volume in not decomposition level is less than that of the half decomposition level in bandwidth for 6 m-18 m clear cutting band. While litter proportion volume in no decomposition level has no significant relationship with the half decomposition level in the area of 5 mx5 m-30 mx30 m. The volume of litter shows band clear cutting 8.67 t/hm2 〉 area clear cutting 4.41 t/ hm2. Water holding capacity in no decomposition layers of the largest proportion is less than that in half decomposition lay ers in each bandwidth, while water holding capacity in no decomposition layers of the largest proportion has no significant relationship with that in half decomposition layers in each area. Maximum litter moisture capacity shows area clear cutting 35.44 t/hm2 〉band clear cutting 14.23 t/hm2. The largest proportion of effective held in no decomposition layers is less than that in half decomposition layers in each bandwidth, while the largest proportion of water holding capacity in no de composition layers has no significant relationship with effective held in half decomposition layers in each area. Litter effective held shows band clear cutting 25.17 t/hm2 〉area clear cutting 7.81 t/hm2. Litter water holding capacity and soaking time are significantly increased with logarithmic relationship, while litter bibulous rate and soaking time are significantly decreased with power relationship.
分 类 号:S753[农业科学—森林经理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40