我国蝴蝶兰DUS测试指南与UPOV指南的异同  

Similarity and Difference between China DUS Test Guidelines and UPOV Guidelines of Phalaenopsis

作　　者：陈和明[1,2] 朱根发[1,2] 吕复兵[1,2] 李冬梅[1,2] 李佐[1,2] 尤毅[1,2] 肖文芳[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]广东省农业科学院环境园艺研究所,广东广州510640 [2]广东省园林花卉种质创新综合利用重点实验室,广东广州510640

出　　处：《中国园艺文摘》2013年第9期149-152,174,共5页Chinese Horticulture Abstracts

基　　金：农业部植物新品种保护项目(农财发[2008]101号);农业行业标准制定和修订项目(农办财[2010]124号);广东省重大科技匹配项目(粤科函财[2009]627号)

摘　　要：介绍我国蝴蝶兰DUS指南与UPOV指南的异同。通过与UPOV指南的比较,我国蝴蝶兰DUS测试指南:(1)在提供的无性繁殖数量至少多5株;(2)增加11个测试性状,并调整UPOV指南中11个性状的表达状态;(3)在技术问卷中申请品种需要指出的性状多7个。The similarity and difference between China DUS guideline and UPOV guideline of Phalaenopsis were introduced in this paper. By comparison with UPOV guideline, DUS guideline provided at least 5 asexual reproduction plants more than UPOV guideline. DUS guideline added 11 test characters, and adjusted the expression of 11 characters in the UPOV guidelines. 7 characters of application varieties that needed to be pointed out in technical questionnaire were added.

关 键 词：蝴蝶兰 DUS测试 测试指南 

分 类 号：S688.4[农业科学—观赏园艺]