马克思经济学与新古典经济学:沉淀成本比较与综合  

Marxist Economics and Neoclassical Economics:Sunk Cost Comparison and Synthesis

作　　者：汤吉军[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学中国国有经济研究中心,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《财经问题研究》2013年第10期3-10,共8页Research On Financial and Economic Issues

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"推进经济结构战略性调整研究"(13&ZD022);国家社会科学基金项目"国有企业跨国投资与政府监管问题研究"(12BGL009);吉林省科技厅软科学项目"沉淀成本视角下吉林省加快传统产业升级转型研究"(20120610);吉林大学"985"工程项目"中国国有经济改革与发展研究"(2010)

摘　　要：本文通过对马克思经济学与新古典经济学关于沉淀成本的比较与综合,确立了广义沉淀成本的内涵,体现了动态调整的经济绩效。笔者不仅将沉淀成本与资本市场、折旧、产品市场价值以及政府经济政策等联系起来,还充分分析产生沉淀成本的原因,为动态经济绩效的政策或制度创新提供一种新的指导原则,即加强沉淀成本和风险管理,处理好自由市场与政府干预关系,对于深化我国市场经济体制改革,预防非自愿性失业和经济危机等具有重大意义。Sunk costs are conventionally defined by neoclassical economists as those costs that are not recoverable in the case of exit. Thus they pay attention to market transaction costs and asset specificity, etc. Marx, however, focuses on the production process and asset depreciation within time horizon irrespective of exit from market. In terms of value realization or cost recovery Marx＇ s sunk costs are defined as inability to realize in the market the full value of their product and the residual value of capital investment. Furthermore, We have found the adverse effect of sunk costs on the involuntary unemployment and economic crisis. As a result policy and institutional innovation are provided toward sunk costs management in market economy, including aggregate supply and demand policy, beyond neoclassical free market perspective in order to create a market economy system adaptable and flexible under the government intervention.

关 键 词：马克思经济学 新古典经济学 沉淀成本 政府干预 

分 类 号：F291[经济管理—国民经济]