检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学经济学院副教授,北京100872 [2]山东财经大学国际经贸学院副教授,济南250014
出 处:《中国社会科学》2013年第9期86-107,206,共22页Social Sciences in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目“国际贸易保护主义盛行背景下中国企业应对贸易壁垒的策略体系研究”(71203228)的阶段性成果
摘 要:以Grossman和Helpman的"保护待售"模型为理论基础,使用1999—2009年案件层面的数据,定量分析印度对华反倾销税裁定的影响因素,揭示中印经济冲突的微观形成机制,可以发现:印度反倾销申诉者的政治势力会显著提高最终裁定的税率水平,进口渗透率同税率之间的关系则取决于申诉者在政治上是否有组织;反倾销税率同印度对华贸易逆差之间呈显著的正相关关系。这意味着,印度当局裁定反倾销税率时,明显受国内利益集团政治势力的影响,同时也有打压中国、谋求在龙象之争中获取优势的动机。Building on Grossman and Helpman's 'Protection for Sale'model,this study employs the case-level data in 1999-2009to analyze empirically the influencing factors in India's decision to impose anti-dumping duties on China,and to reveal the micro formation mechanism of economic conflicts between China and India.The results show that the political power of the Indian anti-dumping petitioner can significantly increase the duty level of the final decision,and that the relationship between import penetration ratio and duties is determined by the fact whether the petitioner belongs to a political organization or not;the anti-dumping duties have a positive correlation with India's trade deficit with China.These indicate that the Indian government's decision on anti-dumping duties is under the obvious influence of the political power of domestic interest groups and the motivation of suppressing China to gain an advantage in the competition between the two countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.240.192