检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省常熟市中医院中西医结合肛肠病诊疗中心,江苏常熟215500
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2013年第9期33-34,共2页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
摘 要:为观察内痔围扎悬吊加外痔弧形切缝术治疗混合痔的疗效,将60例混合痔患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各30例。观察组采用内痔围扎悬吊加外痔弧形切缝术治疗,对照组采用传统痔外剥内扎术治疗。观察两组术后肛门疼痛、肛门水肿、住院时间及疗效等相关指标。结果显示,观察组在术后肛门疼痛评分、肛门水肿发生率及住院时间方面优于对照组,两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结果表明,内痔围扎悬吊加外痔弧形切缝术能有效治疗混合痔,相关指标优于传统痔外剥内扎术,具有创面愈合快、术后并发症少、恢复时间短、安全性高等优点。This study was to observe the clinical efficacy of internal hemorrhoid enclosed ligation and sus- pension plus external hemorrhoid curved incision & suture in treating mixed hemorrhoids. The 60 cases were randomly divided into observation group and control group,30 cases for each. Observation group re- ceived internal hemorrhoid enclosed ligation and suspension plus external hemorrhoid curved incision & su- ture,while control group underwent traditional exernal dissection and internM ligation of hemorrhoids. Both groups were observed for postoperative anal pain and edema, and hospital stay, therapeutic efficacy and other relative indicators. The results showed that observation group was superior to control group in scores of postoperative anal pain,the incidence of anal edema,and hospital stay,and there was no significant difference in clinical efficacy in both groups( P〉0.05). It is concluded that compared with traditional ex- ternal dissection and internal ligation of hemorrhoids,internal hemorrhoid enclosed ligation and suspension plus external hemorrhoid curved incision & suture is more effective,with rapid wound healing, fewer com- plietions,rapid recovery and high safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.10.21