检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875 [2]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
出 处:《山东警察学院学报》2013年第5期29-35,共7页Journal of Shandong Police College
基 金:2010年度国家社科基金重点项目"犯罪构成论体系比较研究"(项目批准号:10AFX007);2012年"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"重点项目"风险社会视野下的刑法修改宏观问题研究"(项目编号:2012WZD11)的阶段性成果~~
摘 要:当前我国刑法理论对于单位犯罪刑事责任的构建仍然受限于自然人刑事责任的理论。实际上,以适用于自然人犯罪的处罚原则来处罚单位犯罪,并不能满足司法实践的需要。同时,以适用于自然人犯罪的处罚标准来衡量单位犯罪所处刑罚的合理性,其结论必然是司法实践的实际需要与理论应然状态的完全脱节。要走出这一误区,就应修正我国单位犯罪的刑事责任理念,基于单位犯罪自身的特殊性来构建我国单位犯罪的刑事责任体系。At present, the criminal responsibility of unit crimes determined by criminal theory in China is still restricted by the theory of criminal responsibility of natural person. In fact, the punishment principle applicable to crimes by natural person is used to punish unit crime, which can not meet the needs of judicial practice. Meanwhile, if the punishment criteria applicable to crime by natural person are used to measure whether the criminal punishment imposed on unit crime is rational, the inevitable conclusion is that the actural needs of judicial practice will be completely divorced from theoretical state. The concept of criminal responsibility of unit crime should be rectified and criminal responsibility system of unit crime should be constructed based on the individual characteristics of unit crime in an effort to step out of misunderstanding.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222