检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋君[1] 王传增[1] 冀晓昊[1] 张艳敏[1] 高利平[1] 刘大亮[1] 张芮[1] 陈学森[1]
机构地区:[1]山东农业大学/作物生物学国家重点实验室,山东泰安271018
出 处:《山东农业科学》2013年第9期23-25,共3页Shandong Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31171932);国家重点基础研究发展计划课题(2011CB100606);山东省农业良种工程项目〔鲁农良种字(2011)7号〕
摘 要:以‘乔纳金’苹果品种为对照,从果实与叶片形态、果实硬度、脆度、香气成分等表型特征以及AFLP分子标记两个层面,对脆肉变株进行了鉴定。结果表明:①‘乔纳金’苹果与其脆肉变株果实与叶片形态基本一致,但脆肉变株的平均单果重仅是‘乔纳金’苹果的83.4%,而果实硬度与脆度分别是‘乔纳金’苹果的1.5倍和1.2倍,具有果实变小、硬度及脆度变大的特点;②两份材料果实香气成分种类总数基本一致,但‘乔纳金’苹果酯类成分种类多、含量高,而脆肉变株醇类和醛类成分种类多、含量高;③AFLP分子标记聚类分析将‘乔纳金’及其脆肉变株聚为一类。结论认为,该脆肉变株就是‘乔纳金’苹果的脆肉芽变。With Jonagold apple as control, its crisp flesh mutant was identified from phenotypic charac-teristics, including morphology of fruit and leaf, fruit hardness, brittleness and aroma components, and AFLP molecular marker. The results were as followed. ①The crisp flesh mutant was basically the same with Jon-agold apple in morphology of fruit and leaf. Its mean fruit weight was 83.4% of that of Jonagold apple. Its fruit hardness and brittleness were 1.5 and 1.2 times respectively of that of Jonagold apple. The crisp flesh mutant had the characteristics of smaller fruit and higher fruit hardness and brittleness. ②The total number of categories of aroma components of the two types was basically consistent. Esters in Jonagold apple had more categories and higher content, while alcohols and aldehydes in crisp flesh mutant. ③Jonagold apple and its crisp flesh mutant were clustered into one group by the cluster analysis of AFLP molecular marker. In conclu-sion, the crisp flesh mutant was the bud mutation on crisp flesh of Jonagold apple.
分 类 号:S661.102.7[农业科学—果树学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30