检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210097 [2]安徽大学管理学院,安徽合肥230052
出 处:《长安大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第3期99-102,107,共5页Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:江苏省博士后科研资助计划(1101100C)
摘 要:运用理论分析和实例分析的方法,对中国地方行政问责制的发展与困境进行了分析。分析认为,问责风暴盛行是当代中国地方行政问责制折射出的重要政治生态特征;问责风暴盛行的根源在于问责制法治化程度不高;同体问责薄弱、异体问责盛行为问责风暴创造了环境基础,问责法制的缺陷无法为行政问责提供制度基础,使得"由谁问"、"向谁问"、"问什么"、"如何问"等问题冲突频频;只有促动问责权向法治化方向发展、加强地方立法工作并重点建构党内问责制,才能走出地方行政问责的当代困境。Based on the theoretical analysis and case study method, the problems and development of local administrative accountability system were analyzed. The accountability storm in contemporary China reflects the important political landscape characteristics of the administrative accountability. The source of accountability storm lies in that the degree of legalization of accountability is low. The single- subject accountability is weak and allogeneic accountability is prevailing, which creates the environment for accountability storm, leads to the situation that the administrative accountability system can't be pro- vided, and causes the problems such as "who asks", "to whom," "ask what", "how to ask". Only by legalizing the accountability power, strengthening local legislation and setting up the intra-party account- ability system, can we steer ourselves out of the predicaments of the local administrative accountability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249