想象竞合犯与法条竞合犯之比较研究  

The Research on Imaginative Joinder of Offence and Statutes Joinder of Offenses

作　　者：李阳[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京市朝阳区人民检察院,中国北京100025

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2013年第5期87-90,共4页Journal of Henan Police College

摘　　要：从分析法条竞合犯与想象竞合犯的本质出发,可以确定法条竞合犯与想象竞合犯的区分标准。在学界中存在着几种代表性学说,通过对想象竞合犯和法条竞合犯的本质进行再认识,可以得出"全部评价说"能够在一定程度上解决想象竞合犯与法条竞合犯区分的难题,并能够在实践中得以应用。The article analyse the difference between imaginative joinder of offence and statutes joinder of offenses from the analysis of their legal nature.Analyse and recommend the types of representive dovtrines which is existing in the acadamic world and give a second cogonition of the nature of imaginative joinder of offence and statues joinder of offenses.On the basis of above preparation,come to the conclusion that the＂full assessment＂is the best solution to solve the problem of distinguishing the joinder of offence and statutes joinder of offenses and the writer thinks it can be exercised effectively in the pratical judical judgement.

关 键 词：法条竞合犯 想象竞合犯 全部评价 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]