检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵峥[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学经济与资源管理研究院,北京100875
出 处:《云南财经大学学报》2013年第5期31-40,共10页Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics
基 金:全国统计科研计划重点项目"我国城市绿色发展的评价体系及测度研究"(2012LZ029);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金重大项目"新形势下中国能源战略发展战略研究"(2009AC-6)
摘 要:基于四阶段DEA和Bootstrap-DEA模型对中国城市公共支出效率进行比较分析,结果表明:传统DEA方法测算的城市公共支出效率值被明显低估;城市产业结构、政府对城市环保的重视程度对中国城市公共支出效率具有显著的影响;基于绿色发展的中国城市公共支出效率差异明显,东部城市的综合效率明显好于中部和西部,而西部城市的规模效率较好,中部城市作为夹心层,各项效率均较低。A comparative analysis is made on the urban public expenditure efficiency in China based on the four - stage DEA and Bootstrap - DEA model, and the results show that traditional DEA method significantly underestimated the value of urban public expenditure efficiency; urban industrial structure, and the degree of government concern on urban environmental protection has significant influence on China's urban public expenditure efficiency; public expenditure efficiency based on green development in different cities is clearly different, with the comprehensive efficien- cy of eastern cities better than those in the central and western regions. However, the scale effi-ciency in western cities is comparatively better. As a sandwich layer, the efficiency values of the central region are relatively lower.
关 键 词:绿色发展 公共支出效率 四阶段数据包络分析 基于自主法的数据包络分析
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15