骶神经阻滞复合全麻在阴道前后壁修补术中比较观察  

Block Compound General Anesthesia in the Vaginal Wall Repair Surgery

作　　者：范天仁[1] 田刘军[1] 郭晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]潍坊市人民医院疼痛科,山东潍坊261041

出　　处：《医学与哲学（B）》2013年第9期33-34,共2页Medicine & Philosophy(B)

摘　　要：比较气管插管全麻和骶神经阻滞复合全麻用于阴道前后壁修补术患者的麻醉以及镇痛效果.选择60例年龄60岁～65岁需行阴道前后壁修补术的患者,将患者随机分为对照组（C组）和研究组（R组）,观察两组患者术中阴道肌肉松弛程度评分以及术后1h,2h,6h,12h,24h （T1,T2,T3,T4,T5）疼痛强度.结果R组术中阴道肌肉松弛程度较C组好,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,术后患者镇痛效果好,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.因此,骶神经阻滞复合全麻为阴道前后壁修补术提供了一种安全方便,有效无痛的麻醉方法.Anesthesia and analgesia effect of endotracheal intuhation general anesthesia compared with sacral nerve block compound general anesthesia for vaginal wall repair surgery patients. 60 vaginal wall repair surgery patients aged 60~ 65 years old were randomly divided into control group （group C） and research group （group R）. Intraoperative vaginal muscle relaxation scores and postoperative pain intensity at 1 h, 2h, 6h, 12h , 24h（T1, T2, T3, T4, TS） hours after operation were observed for both groups. Intraoperative vaginal muscle relaxation degree and postoperative analgesia effect in research group were better then control group. Significant differences could be observed（P〈0.05）. Our results suggested that sa- cral nerve block compound general anesthesia provided a safe convenient and effectively painless method of anesthesia for the vaginal wall repair surgery .

关 键 词：骶神经阻滞 全麻 阴道前后壁修补术 

分 类 号：R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]