利比亚战争后的北约及其战略动态研究  

A Study on the Dynamic Strategy of NATO after Its Military Intervention in Libya

作　　者：许海云[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学历史学院

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期78-86,共9页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目"北约模式与亚洲安全模式比较研究"(08JA0083);中国人民大学985项目的研究成果

摘　　要：北约对利比亚的军事干预已成往事,但这次军事干预充分显示了北约在后冷战时期的战略动态。北约新战略脱胎于20世纪90年代纷纭多变的国际政治与安全环境,伴随着北约对科索沃、伊拉克、阿富汗、利比亚的军事干预而不断成熟。北约对利比亚的军事干预集中展示了其大战略思维、"非接触性战争政策"、"无边界集体防御原则"等,突显了北约谋求"巧防御"、"快速反应"、"综合指导"、"兼顾国际与区域政策"、"军事与民事相结合"等新手法。然而,北约对利比亚的军事干预也暴露了其战略形态的许多不足:缺乏完整规划以及国际法理基础、战略定位片面与错位、与地区及国际需要存在距离等。The NATO＇s military intervention in Libya clearly show s its new strategic trend during the Post-cold w ar era,w hich originated from the changeable w orld of politics and security in 1990s and gradually developed in the follow ing military interventions in Kosovo,Afghanistan,Iraq and Libya.As a matter of fact,NATO＇s military intervention in Libya demonstrates to the w orld its grand strategy——＂non-contact w ar policy＂and＂non-boundary collective defense principle＂,featuring w ith a series of new approaches such as ＂flexible defense＂,＂fast reaction＂,comprehensive guidance＂,＂international and regional policy balance＂,＂military and civilian cooperation＂,and etc.How ever,it also displays some of its shortages,including the absence of integral planning and international legal basis,unbalanced orientation and misplacement of the strategy,inadaptability to the regional and international needs,and etc.

关 键 词：利比亚战争 北约战略 “非接触性战争” “智能型作战” 

分 类 号：D518[政治法律—政治学]