检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈凌剑[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《宁波广播电视大学学报》2013年第3期47-51,共5页Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
摘 要:风险社会的提出近年来引起热议,风险社会所勾勒出现代社会的灾难性图景促使刑法学界试图提出风险刑法来应对风险的侵袭。但是综合风险刑法的观点,其对风险社会的理解出现谬误,导致风险刑法失去理论根据。需要通过对风险社会理论的阐释,分析风险刑法在理论构建时对风险社会理解的层次谬误,对其以来的理论前提进行"证伪"才能揭示风险刑法的"伪命题"实质。The risk society theory has? become a burning debate recently. The disastrous future it predicts urges scholars on criminal law to construct the risk criminal law system to cope with the risks. But there are some misunderstandings in the compre- hension of the risk society theory leading to the loss of theoretical basis in the risk criminal law. This paper, by interpreting the risk society theory, .analyzes the comprehension errors in the risk society theory under the theoretical construction of the risk crimi- nal law and reveals the risk criminal law theory in real terms, which, in fact, is a pseudo-proposition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.244