检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康总江[1] 朱亮[1] 魏书军[1] 石宝才[1]
机构地区:[1]北京市农林科学院植保环保所,北京100097
出 处:《北方园艺》2013年第20期112-114,共3页Northern Horticulture
基 金:国家桃产业技术体系资助项目(NYCYTX-31-02);国家公益性行业科研专项资助项目(200803006);国家重点基础研究发展计划资助项目(2009CB119004)
摘 要:以小菜蛾成虫为试虫,研究比较了3种不同性质诱捕孔处理的诱捕器对小菜蛾逃逸率的影响。结果表明:锥形防逃逸诱捕孔处理的诱捕器中小菜蛾的逃逸率为1.82%,不放诱芯的逃逸率为14.97%;加防逃逸管诱捕器的逃逸率为4.79%,加防逃逸管不放诱芯的逃逸率为19.73%;直通式诱捕器的逃逸率为31.79%,不放诱芯的逃逸率为40.58%。同种诱捕器加放诱芯与不放诱芯,虫子逃逸几率相差10个百分点左右。Taking adult Plutella zylostella (L.) as material, the effect of 3 different traps on escape ratio of it was compared and studied. The results showed that the escape ratio of conical hole traps was 1. 82% ,and the one without lure was 14. 97%. The escape ratio of conical hole traps with cannulation to avoid pest escaping was 4. 79%, and the one without lure was 19. 73%. The escape ratio of the non-cover traps was 31.79 % ,and the one without lure was 40. 58%. The escape ratio of traps without lure was 10 percent point than the one with lure.
分 类 号:S436.341.24[农业科学—农业昆虫与害虫防治]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222