“剽窃”的法律蕴涵——对《剽窃概念的界定及其私法责任研究》之己见  

The Legal Connotation of Plagiarism

作　　者：牛强[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2013年第10期54-60,共7页Intellectual Property

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年基金项目"网络版权侵权判决实证研究"(11YJC820086)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：剽窃的本质是混淆整部作品,进而导致作者身份混同的行为。"欺诈说"在对剽窃本质的认识上有所偏颇,且不具逻辑自足性。剽窃不同于版权侵权、"文化商品不正当竞争"等制度,而是规制波普尔"知识世界"中的"文化产品混同"的制度。剽窃具有独立的法律地位,其构成要素包括:不受版权法保护的文化要素的盗用及"文化产品混同"的产生。Plagiarism is the conduct that confused the whole work and caused of confusion of authors identity. The ＂fraud theory＂ biased the nature of plagiarism and lacked logical self-sufficiency. Plagiarism is different from copyright infringement, attribution, and cultural commodity unfair competition. It aims at regulating cultural products confusion In Popper＇s knowledge world.Plagiarism has independent legal status, which includes two elements, namely, the theft of cultural elements which are not protected by copyright law and the emergence of cultural products confusion.

关 键 词：剽窃 剽窃“欺诈说” 版权侵权 文化产品混同 

分 类 号：D923.4-5[政治法律—民商法学]