检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋佳杉[1,2] 刘玉祁[1] 刘存志[3] 解秸萍[1] 马良宵[1] 王麟鹏[3] 郑媛媛[4] 马增斌[5] 杨欢 陈旭 石广霞[3] 李石良[8] 赵吉平[9] 韩景献[10] 王燕霞[9] 刘建平[1] 朱江[1]
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学针灸推拿学院,北京100029 [2]北京中医药大学第三附属医院,北京100029 [3]北京中医医院,北京100010 [4]北京市垂杨柳医院,北京100022 [5]北京医院,北京100730 [6]北京市羊坊店医院,北京100038 [7]护国寺中医医院,北京100007 [8]中日友好医院,北京100029 [9]东直门医院,北京100070 [10]天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津300193
出 处:《针刺研究》2013年第5期393-398,共6页Acupuncture Research
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2006CB 504503;2012CB 518506);国家自然科学基金面上项目(30973793);教育部博士点基金项目(20090013110005)
摘 要:目的:评价电针三阴交、悬钟、非穴对原发性痛经患者是否存在累积镇痛效应及其效应差异。方法:采用随机方法将200例原发性痛经患者分为三阴交组、悬钟组、非穴组、对照组,每组各50例。三阴交组、悬钟组、非穴组于痛经开始发作并且疼痛视觉模拟评分量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)≥40时进行电针治疗,每次30min,每日1次,连续治疗3d。分别在3次治疗前及3次起针即刻(电针30min)测量VAS值,同时分别在上述观察时点记录痛经总体伴随症状严重程度评分(RSS-COX 2总分)。结果:三阴交组、悬钟组、非穴组VAS值的降低程度显著大于对照组(P<0.001),三阴交组、悬钟组、非穴组组间两两比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);三阴交组、悬钟组、非穴组RSS-COX 2总分降低程度显著大于对照组(P<0.05),三阴交组、悬钟组、非穴组组间两两比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:电针三阴交、悬钟、非穴对原发性痛经患者的累积镇痛效应及痛经总体伴随症状严重程度的改善均优于未进行治疗的患者;三阴交、悬钟、非穴三者之间的累积镇痛效应无差异。Objective To compare the cumulative analgesic effect of electroacupuncture (EA) stimulation of Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Xuanzhong (GB 39) and non-acupeint for primary dysmenorrhea patients. Methods A total of 200 patients with prima ry dysmenorrhea were randomly assigned to Sanyinjiao (SP 6, a dysmenorrheal-relieving related acupoint) group, Xuanzhong (GB 39, an unrelated acupoint) group, non-acupoint group and control group, with 50 cases in each group. The participants were administered with EA (2 Hz/100 Hz, 0.5- 1.6 mA) at SP 6, GB 39 and non-acupoint for 30 min, once daily for 3 consecutive days. The intensity of the pain was ranked from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intolerable) using visual analogue scale (VAS) and RSS (Cox retrospective symptom scale) severity rating scores (RSS-COX 2) before and after three interventions. Results In comparisonwith the control group, VAS and RSS-COX 2 scores were significantly lower in the SP 36, GB 39 and non-acupoint groups ( P0 001, P〈0.05), suggesting an alleviation of the pain severity after EA treatment. No significant differences were found a- mong the three treatment groups in both VAS and RSS-COX 2 scores (P〈0.05). Conclusion EA stimulation of SP 6, GB 39 and non-acupoint has a good cumulative analgesic effect in patients with primary dysmenorrhea.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3