浮针治疗中风后肩手综合征临床观察  

Clinical Observation on Treatment of Shoulder-Hand Syndrome after Stroke by Floating Needling

作　　者：叶水林[1] 黄怀[1] 古菁[1] 张旭[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州军区广州总医院神经医学专科医院神经康复二科,广东广州510010

出　　处：《辽宁中医药大学学报》2013年第11期223-225,共3页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:观察浮针治疗中风后肩手综合征的临床疗效。方法:将80例患者分为2组,2组均有基础药物治疗,治疗组使用浮针疗法,对照组使用传统电针法,治疗为每周连续治疗5 d,休息2 d,3周为1个疗程。疗程结束后观察:2组临床疗效、治疗前后2组神经功能缺损程度评分、肩手综合征评估量表及疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)比较。结果:2组临床疗效比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05),表明浮针组临床疗效优于单纯传统电针组;神经功能缺损程度评分、肩手综合征评估量表评分(SHS)、疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分方面浮针组与对照组比较,差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05)。提示:浮针治疗中风后肩手综合征其临床疗效优于传统电针组。结论:浮针疗法治疗中风后肩手综合征疗效显著。Objective ： To observe the clinical curative effect of floating needling treatment for shoulder- hand syndrome after stroke. Methods ： 80 patients were divided into two groups, based on the drug treatment, the treatment group used the floating needling therapy, and the control group used the conventional electric acupuncture. The therapeutic continuous treatment was five days a week, two days rest, three weeks of a course of treatment. After the treatment, clinical efficacy and neurological deficit scores before and after treatmen were observed. The shoulder-hand syndrome Assessment Scale and pain visual analog scale （ VAS ） were compared. Results：The clinical efficacy of the two groups had statistically significant difference （ P〈0.05 ）, indicating that the clinical efficacy of floating needling was better than that of the conventional electro-acupuncture group. The neurological deficit scores, shoulder-hand syndrome Assessment Scale score （ SItS ）, pain visual analog scale （ VAS ） score of floating acupuncture group was statistically significant compared with the control group （ P〈0.05 ）. The clinical efficacy of floating needling treatment on shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke is superior to conventional electro-acupuncture group. Conclusion ： Floating needling therapy of shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke has significant effect.

关 键 词：浮针 中风后肩手综合征 对照 临床观察 

分 类 号：R255.2[医药卫生—中医内科学]