珠三角边缘带旅游比较研究  

Comparison in Tourism in the Fringe Belt of the Pearl River Delta

作　　者：廖继武[1] 

机构地区：[1]肇庆学院旅游学院,广东肇庆526061

出　　处：《惠州学院学报》2013年第5期40-44,50,共6页Journal of Huizhou University

基　　金：肇庆学院博士启动项目(201108)

摘　　要：边缘带发展滞后,研究边缘带是加快其发展、协调区域平衡的基础工作。选取珠三角边缘的惠州、清远与肇庆三地进行定性定量比较,试图找出珠三角边缘带旅游发展的有关规律。研究发现:珠三角边缘带利用自然旅游资源丰富的条件大力发展旅游业,并取得可喜进步,但与核心区仍有较大差距;惠州经济社会条件好,旅游发展也高于清远与肇庆;肇庆历史文化条件较好,人文与自然旅游资源均优于惠州与清远,但未得到充分开发;清远对国内旅游市场开发较为成功。The economies in the fringe belt lag behind thosein the central zone. The study on the fringe belt is the basis to accelerate its development and coordinate the balance between the fringe belt and the central zone. Selecting Huizhou, Qingyuan and Zhaoqing loca- ting in the fringe belt of the Pearl River Delta（ the PRD）as the cases, taking qualitative and quantitative comparative methods, the paper tries to find some laws on tourism development in the fringe belt of the PRD. The result indicates ： 1 ） the tourism industry has been greatly developed and has made enormous progress in the fringe belt of the PRD with the use of rich natural tourism resources, but there is still a large gap between the fringe belt and the central zone;2）the economic and social conditions in Huizhou are better than those in Qingyuan and Zhaoqing, and the level of tourism development in Huizhou is also higher than that in Qingyuan and Zhaoqing;3）the his- toric and cultural conditions and human and natural tourism resources in Zhaoqing are superior to those in Huizhou and Qingyuan, but they haven＇t been fully exploited yet;4）Qingyuan has more successfully developed the domestic tourism market.

关 键 词：珠三角 边缘带 旅游发展 

分 类 号：F590.3[经济管理—旅游管理]