检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳大学法学院 [2]深圳市宝安区法院行政庭,广东深圳518060
出 处:《惠州学院学报》2013年第5期101-106,共6页Journal of Huizhou University
基 金:2011年广东省高级人民法院重点调研课题项目
摘 要:法院对"司法强拆"的申请的审查包括对征收决定的实体性和程序性审查,实体性审查包括是否超越权限、遵循信赖利益保护原则、合乎比例,重在约束行政机关克服怠惰和恣意,依据公益和补偿的法律授权,作出不掺杂其他目标、事实清楚的合理的征收决定;程序性审查包括行政机关是否满足被征收人的受告知权、听证权和知情权,旨在克服行政意思决定的单方性,真实有效地保护私主体一方的利益,提高行政效能。法院的裁定不仅仅为被征收人及其财产权获得公平的对待和补偿,而且促使行政机关依法行政和建设法治政府。The review of the application of judicial forced demolitions by the court consists of substantive review and procedural review of administrative expropriation decision. The substantive review includes whether they exceed their authority, whether they follow the principle of reliance interest protection, whether they are proportionate so as to constrain the administrative organs to overcome laziness and willfulness and make, according to public interest and compensation legal authorization, reasonable administrative expropriation de- cisions without mixing other objectives but with clear facts. The procedural review includes whether the administrative organs meet the right of the expropriated persons to be told, to hear, and to know, so as to overcome the unilateral of administrative decision, to truly and effectively protect the private interests, and to improve administrative efficiency. The court~ ruling not only makes the expropriated per- sons get fair treatment and compensation, but also promotes the administrative organs to administrate by the law and build a government under the rule of law.
关 键 词:司法强拆 合法性审查 实体性审查 程序性审查 裁定
分 类 号:D912.112[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.177.173