检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘春明[1,2,3] 佟铁钢[1,2,3] 何继善[1,2,3]
机构地区:[1]中南大学有色资源与地质灾害探测湖南省重点实验室,长沙410083 [2]中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院,长沙410083 [3]中南大学地质调查研究院,长沙410083
出 处:《中国有色金属学报》2013年第9期2422-2429,共8页The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41227803;41374119);湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(13JJ3011)
摘 要:为了对比分析广域电磁法、音频大地电磁法(AMT)与可控源音频大地电磁法(CSAMT)的勘探效果,在山东某金矿的已知地质剖面开展了多种电磁法实验勘探,通过对比分析在相同剖面上的实验结果发现,相对于AMT而言,广域电磁法具有浅层分辨能力高、抗干扰能力强、工作效率高等优点;相对于CSAMT而言,则具有勘探深度大、抗干扰能力强、工作效率高等优点。关于广域电磁法的高频段广域电阻率与卡尼亚电阻率不重合现象、场源效应和阴影效应、电磁场多分量综合利用等问题上还值得探讨和研究。A variety of electromagnetic exploration methods, involving the wide field electromagnetic metnoa, me aualo magnetotelluric method (AMT) and the controlled source audio frequency magnetotelluric method (CSAMT), were carried out on a known geologic profile of a gold mine in Shandong Province, with the purpose of comparison in the real exploration effects. Through the comparison of the exploration results, from the same section, it is found that the wide field electromagnetic method has advantages of shallow high resolution capability, strong anti-interference ability and high survey efficiency compared with AMT, and it is better than CSAMT in the exploration depth, anti-interference ability and working efficiency. However, the study and research should be moved fitrther including the inconsistency phenomenon between the wide field electromagnetic resistivity and the Cagniard resistivity at high frequency, source effect and static effect, and the utilization of electromagnetic multi-components.
关 键 词:广域电磁法 音频大地电磁法 可控源音频大地电磁法 勘探深度 抗干扰能力
分 类 号:P319.3[天文地球—固体地球物理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222