检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张力元[1]
出 处:《学理论》2013年第29期58-59,共2页Theory Research
基 金:陕西师范大学国家级大学生创新性实验计划项目(201210781138)
摘 要:由于人们的知识经验和能力有限,对于较为重要或复杂的决策问题,决策者常常需要寻求他人建议,或者直接请他人代己决策。近几十年来,诸多学者探讨了自己决策、建议采纳、代他人决策等之间的差异,以期获得决策质量等差异形成的原因及其机制。以往研究表明,自己-他人决策差异确实存在,从决策准备(信息的选择与加工)、决策过程(选择偏好)、决策结果(决策的质量与满意度)几个视角对相关研究做出整理和陈述,并对未来自己-他人决策研究提出新视角。Because of the limitation of people's experiences and abilities, decision makers always need to ask for advise, or even ask somebody decide for them, when they face the important and complex problems to solve. These years, the differences among self decision, advice taken and make decision for others have attracted more and more research attention, researchers tend to evaluate the deep reasons which would influence the decision qualities. The research in the literature, revealed that self-other decision making differences do exist. This article displays correlational studies in three aspects: pre-decision (The selection and processing of information), decision making process (choice preference) and the consequence of decision (decision quality and satisfaction). In addition, I suggest some new search angles for self-other decision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28