检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学教育学院,副教授北京100872 [2]中山大学资讯管理学院,辅导员广东广州510006
出 处:《中国高教研究》2013年第11期8-13,共6页China Higher Education Research
基 金:中国人民大学亚洲研究中心项目"东亚地区高等教育筹资结构比较研究"(项目编号:亚研字2012005)的研究成果
摘 要:世界各国普遍将高等教育视为政府公共投入的重要领域之一。然而,现实中各国对高等教育的公共投入又是千差万别的。本研究尝试采用OECD国家2000-2009年的面板数据,研究影响这种差异的主要因素及其影响程度。实证分析结果显示:高等教育相对收入、生均经费、人口结构和财政支出比重四个变量对高等教育公共投入的影响都非常显著,其中,前三个变量与公共投入是负的相关性,而财政支出比重与公共投入则为正的相关性。也就是说,高等教育个人收益率越高、生均经费越高、适龄人口比例越高的国家,高等教育公共资金占总经费的比例越低;而财政支出比重越高的国家,高等教育公共资金所占比例则越高。All the countries of the world regard higher education as one of the important fields of the government's public expenditure. However, higher education public expenditure of countries is also differ in thousands of ways in reality. The research attempts to study the main factors leading the differences and its influence through the analysis of panel data of OECD countries in the period of 2000-2009. Through empirical analysis, the following four variables have a significant impact on higher education public expenditure, that is relative earning of tertiary education, expenditure per students for tertiary education, rate of young people and public expenditure percentage of GDP. Among them, the first three variables have a negative correlation with the higher education public expenditure, while the proportion of public finance has a positive correlation with the higher education public expenditure. That is to say, the higher of the personal income of higher education, student's average expenditure, rate of school-age population, the lower proportion of higher education expenditure among total funds; while, the higher proportion of financial expenditure, the higher proportion of higher education expenditure of total funds.
分 类 号:G649.1[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117