话语权与中国文学史研究  

The Discourse Power in the Studies of History of Chinese Literature

作　　者：曹顺庆[1] 郭明浩[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,成都610065

出　　处：《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》2013年第5期75-88,159,共14页Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部重大招标项目"英语世界的中国文学译介与研究"(12JZD016);中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项重大项目(SKX201002)

摘　　要：中国文学的承传、嬗变与论争从根本上讲都是围绕话语权展开的,话语权是考察中国文学最基本同时也是最为重要的维度。以《毛诗序》为代表的儒家文论话语权自汉代以后影响中国文学两千多年,梁启超认为,令人"捧腹喷饭之资料更不可一二数"的《毛诗序》,造就了"千余年共认为神圣不可侵犯之宝典,真不可思议之怪象矣",这个不可思议的"怪象"实乃话语权所致,而其间所上演的沿袭与悖离之间的博弈其实质是话语权的争夺;根深蒂固的"诗文正统论"压制了包括词曲、戏剧、小说在内的其他文学体式的发展;而"文言正统论"视文言文学为唯一正统,使白话文学长期被主流话语轻视。中国文学史的嬗变从根本上讲是围绕话语权展开的,话语权是考察中国文学演进的结穴所在。The vicissitudes in the historical development of Chinese literature may well be reduced into the struggle for discourse power,which is the most important in the study of Chinese literature. Since the Han Dynasty,the discourse power in Confucian literary theory as represented by'Mao's Preface to The Book of Songs'has got Chinese literature under its sway for more than two thousand years. But,the contemporary literary master Liang Qichao simply regards as ridiculous phenomenon that a laughable piece of writing quite unexpectedly turned to be holy and inviolable literary sutra. This ridiculousness is indeed resulted from the dominance of discourse power,and the struggle for this power has brought forth the ups and downs in the development of Chinese literature: the orthodoxy of poetry has repressed the prosperity of such literary genres as [WTBX]ci[WTBZ]-poetry,opera and novel; and the classical language has regarded itself as the orthodox literary medium,leaving the vernacular literature long been neglected. Therefore,to study Chinese literature is to examine the struggle between discourses.

关 键 词：话语权 中国文学史 《毛诗序》 诗文正统论 文言正统论 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]