戴明扬对《嵇康集》目录编次的考证  

On Research into Catalog Choreography of the “Collected Works of Ji Kang” by Dai Mingyang

作　　者：叶当前[1] 

机构地区：[1]安庆师范学院文学院,安徽安庆246052

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期58-62,共5页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：安徽省社科规划项目(AHSKF09-10D61);国家社科规划基金项目(11BZW019)

摘　　要：《嵇康集》屡经辗转,诗文目录在不同版本及著录称引中各有同异,编次也缠夹混乱,在鲁迅《嵇康集考》及辑校本的基础上,戴明扬充分利用吴宽丛书堂抄本,细致考证了《兄秀才公穆入军赠诗十九首》等诗文称题;要言不烦地考证了吴抄本称题讹误、刻本称题讹误、吴抄本抄写错乱、题目与内容不一致等版本上的目录编次问题;旁搜博采,校释了著录称引出现的不同意见。综而言之,戴氏《嵇康集校注》通过题注的方式对《嵇康集》目录编次的考证具有很高的文献价值。＂The Collected Works of Ji Kang＂ was removed many times. The catalog was different in different versions. Dai Mingyang researched the name of ＂the Nineteen Poems to His Brother＂ , the error of the copying version by Wu, the disorder of the version by Wu, the error of the edition, the inconsistence of the subject and content on the basis of Lu Xun and the copying version by Wu. He pointed out the difference of the bibliographic data and the extract. Dai＇ s works were valuable in philology.

关 键 词：戴明扬 鲁迅 《嵇康集考》 《嵇康集校注》 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]