检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵贤忠[1,2] 李承存[3] 潘沁心 孙记燕[1,2] 葛永亮[1,2] 付子俊 殷东京[1,2] 王乡宁 李丽[1,2] 杨洁[6] 徐西胜[3] 施佺[7] 胡栋才
机构地区:[1]南通大学附属南通市第三人民医院 [2]南京中医药大学南通中西医结合临床学院,江苏南通226006 [3]泰山医学院附属医院,山东泰安271000 [4]浏阳市中医院,湖南浏阳410300 [5]雅安市人民医院,四川雅安213000 [6]成都大学附属医院,四川成都610081 [7]南通大学计算机科学与技术学院,江苏南通226006 [8]北京荣祥再生医学研究所,北京100020
出 处:《中国烧伤创疡杂志》2013年第5期342-348,共7页The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
基 金:江苏省南通市人民政府科研基金(项目编号:BK2011069)~~
摘 要:目的比较不同的创面治疗方法对烧伤休克期体液变化及液体复苏的影响。方法随机选择烧伤面积为30%TBSA^90%TBSA的严重烧伤患者,分别采用烧伤再生医疗技术(A组,30例)和传统的磺胺嘧啶银霜抗炎疗法(B组,30例)治疗,通过计算机模拟分析两组患者休克期体液变化及液体复苏情况,比较治疗效果。结果 A组患者休克期补液量、净体重增加量(水肿)、平均住院时间、医疗赞用情况和全身感染性脓毒血症发生率均明显低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。虽然A组患者尿量多于B组、休克征象发生率低于B组,但P>0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论 在重度烧伤治疗中,不同的创面治疗方法对烧伤休克期患者体液变化、复苏及预后均有影响,烧伤再生医疗技术比磺胺嘧啶银霜抗炎疗法更有利于减轻烧伤对患者体液的影响以及液体复苏、稳定有效血容量和改善预后。Objective To compare the influences of different wound treatment therapies on body fluid and resusci- tation of burns at the shock stage. Methods Severe burned patients with a TBSA between 30% -90% were enrolled ran- domly to receive Moist Exposed Burn Therapy (MEBT) (Group A with 30 patients) and the traditional antibiotic therapy ofSD-Ag ( Group B with 30 patients) respectively. The body fluid changes and resuscitation condition of the two groups were analyzed by computer stimulation and the therapeutic effects were compared. Results Group A was obviously lower than Group B in terms of the fluid replacement volume, the net increase of body weight ( edema), mean hospitalization time, medical expenses and the incidence of systemic infectious sepsis, and the differences were all significant in statistics (P 〈 0. 05 ). Though the urine volume in Group A was higher than that in Group B and the incidence of shock signs in the former was lower than that in the latter, their differences had no significance in statistics ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion In the treat- ment of severe burns, different wound treatment therapies will have different influences on the body fluid changes at the shock stage, resuscitation and prognosis. Compared with SD-Ag therapy, MEBT is a better therapy in that it can reduce the impairment of burns on patients' body fluid and resuscitation, stabilize the effective blood volume and improve the prognosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.91.70