高校学术期刊综合评价指标体系的咨询法研究  

The Consultation Method of Comprehensive Evaluation Index System of University Academic Journal

作　　者：刘文华[1] 张琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽卫生职业技术学院学报杂志社,合肥230061

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期101-104,共4页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：中国高校科技期刊研究会科技期刊学研究基金项目(GBJB1006)

摘　　要：目的:研究探讨高校学报综合评价指标体系的指标的及其权重分配。方法:检索国内外学术期刊评价体系得失和高校学术期刊的评价要求,采用开放式专家咨询法研究高校学术期刊的评价指标的设立及其权重分配。结果:根据咨询专家意见提出了一级指标3项,二级指标13项,三级指标42项,其中,一级指标及其权重分别是,学术质量46.2%、编辑出版质量35.9%、管理和经营发展实力17.9%。结论:高校学术期刊的综合评价指标体系应是全面的开放的评价体系,既突出学术期刊的学术性,又坚持编辑出版本身的专业性,并充分相关高校学术期刊的特殊性。The objective of this study is to explore the comprehensive evaluation index system of university journals and its weight distribution.The method is to retrieve the gain and loss of academic journal evaluation system both home and abroad and evaluation requirements of academic journals of colleges and universities and use open expert consultation method to research the establishment of evaluation index of academic journals of colleges and universities and its weights allocation.Results： According to the consulting experts＇ opinions,the study puts forward 3 first level indicators,13 secondary indicators,and 42 tertiary indicators.Among them,the first level indicators and their weights are academic quality 46.2%,quality of editing and publication 35.9%,and management and business development strength 17.9% respectively.Conclusion： The comprehensive evaluation index system of academic periodicals in colleges and universities should be fully an open evaluation one,both project academic journals and adhere to the professionalism of the editing and publication itself,and enrich the particularity of the related academic journals of colleges and universities.

关 键 词：高校学术期刊 综合评价体系 三级指标 权重分配 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学] G255.2