正常人群的情绪状态与瞳孔大小的关系  被引量:9

Correlation between emotional status and pupils size in normal people

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李艾 刘铁刚[2] 席玲 卢正华 

机构地区:[1]北京首都机场股份有限公司公共区管理部,北京市100621 [2]北京首都国际机场医院眼科,北京市100621

出  处:《眼科新进展》2013年第11期1075-1077,共3页Recent Advances in Ophthalmology

摘  要:目的探讨正常人群不同情绪状况、性别及年龄与瞳孔直径及瞳孔直径变化的关系。方法对在北京首都国际机场地面出租车等候区等候的人群进行观察,记录自愿受访的60名(60眼)等候者性别、年龄和情绪状态以及瞳孔直径的大小、直径变化情况。按照被观察者年龄分为低年龄组(18~40岁)和高年龄组(4l岁以上),并根据其情绪记录其为愉快、平静、焦虑及急躁4种状态。被观察人群不同性别、年龄及情绪状况下瞳孔直径及直径变化情况的比较应用单因素方差分析,组间两两比较行IJsD检验。结果愉快、平静、焦虑及急躁4种状态被观察者瞳孔直径分别为(5,34±1.41)mm、(3.50±1.25)mm、(3.17±0.86)mm及(4.91±1.81)mm,瞳孔直径变化分别为(3.24±1.99)mm、(1.62±1.25)mm、(1.01±0.89)mm及(2.86±1.93)mm;不同情绪状态下被观察者瞳孔直径及直径变化情况差异有统计学意义(F=10.86、9.87,均为P=0.000)。愉快组瞳孔直径及变化程度与平静组、焦虑组差异均有统计学意义(P=0.001、0.007;p=0.000、0.000),而与急躁组无明显差异(P=0.375、0.467)。急躁组瞳孔直径及变化程度与平静组、焦虑组差异均有统计学意义(P=0.027、0.042;P=0.001、0.001),而平静组与焦虑组之间两项指标无明显差异(P=0.560、0.297)。男性及女性被观察者瞳孔直径分别为(4.61±1.64)mm及(2.95±1.58)mm,瞳孔直径变化分别为(3.01±1.52)mm及(1.86±1.04)mm;不同性别瞳孔直径及变化程度差异有统计学意义(F=9.58、10.34,均为P=0.000)。男性瞳孔直径较女性偏大,变化能力偏强。低年龄组及高年龄组被观察者瞳孔直径分别为(5.10±1.62)mm及(3.84±1.47)mm,瞳孔直径变化分别为(2.97±1.45)mm及(1.23±0.69)mm;不同Objective To analyze the correlation between emotional status, age, gender and the size and alteration of pupils in normal people. Methods A toatl of 60 volunteers (60 eyes) waiting for taxis in the ground transportation waiting zone of BCIA (Beijing Capital International Airport) were interviewed. Emotional status, gender, age, the size and alteration of volunteers' pupils were recorded. Emotional status included happiness, calmness, anxiety and impatience. People were divided into low-aged group (younger than 40 years old) and high-aged group( older than 40 years old). Comparison of the size and alteration of pupils in different gender, age, and emotional status group were analyzed by the means of ANOVA, difference between two groups was analyzed by LSD test. Results The size of pupils in cases with emotional status of happiness, cahrmess,anxiety and impatience were (5.34 ± 1.41 ) rnm, (3.50 ± 1.25) ram, (3.17 ±0. 86)mm and(4.91 ±1.81 ) mm,respectively, and the alteration were(3.24 ± 1.99) ram, ( 1.62 ± 1.25 ) mm, ( 1.01 ±0. 89 )mm and(2.86 ± 1.93 ) mm, respectively, the difference of the size and alteration of pupils under different emotional status were statistically significance(F = 10.86,9.87 ;All P = 0.00 ). There were statistical differences in the size and alteration of pupils between happiness group and calmness group, anxiety group (P = 0. 001,0. 007 ; P = 0. 000,0. 000 ), but no statistical difference between happiness group and impatience group (P = 0. 375,0. 467). There were statistical differences in the size and alteration of pupils between impatience group and calmness group, anxiety group(P = 0. 027,0. 042 ;P = 0. 001,0.001 ), but there was no statistical difference between calmness group and anxiety group (P = 0.550,0. 297 ). The size of pupils in male and female group were (4.51 ± 1.54) mm and(2.95 ± 1.58) ram,respectively,the alteration were(3.01 ± 1.52)ram and( 1.86 ± 1.04) mm, respectively, the

关 键 词:瞳孔大小 瞳孔变化 情绪状态 

分 类 号:R471[医药卫生—护理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象