针灸加推拿正骨手法配合牵引与推拿正骨手法配合牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症的对比疗效观察  

Comparison of Curative Effect Observation of Acupuncture Add Massage Manipulation with Traction and Manipulation of Massage with Traction on Treating Prolapse of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc

作　　者：胡英[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省成都市第一人民医院针灸科,四川成都610041

出　　处：《四川中医》2013年第7期137-139,共3页Journal of Sichuan of Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:对比针灸加推拿正骨手法配合牵引与推拿正骨手法配合牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法:将94例患者随机分为针灸加推拿正骨手法配合牵引治疗组(47例),推拿正骨手法配合牵引治疗组(47例),两组均使用ATA-ⅡD型腰椎自动牵引床行间歇牵引,每日1次,10天为1疗程,在4个疗程后观察评定疗效。结果:针灸加推拿正骨手法配合牵引治疗组总有效率为87.23%,推拿正骨手法配牵引组总有效率为80.85%,两组差异显著(P<0.05)。结论:针灸加推拿正骨手法配合牵引较推拿正骨手法配合牵引疗效更佳。Objective： To compare the effect of acupuncture add massage manipulation with traction and manipulation of massage with traction to treat prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods ： 94 patients were randomly divided into treatment groups with 47 eases for acupuncture add massage manipulation with traction and treatment groups with 47 cases for massage ma nipulation with traction. Both two groups were using ATA- Ⅱ D type automatic traction beds, 1 time a day and 10 days for 1 course. After 4 courses of treatment, curative effects of both methods were compared. Results ： The total effective rate for acu puncture add massage manipulation with traction was 87.23%, while the rate for manipulation of massage with traction group was 80. 85%. Difference about treatment effects between the two groups was significant （P〈0. 05）. Conclusion： Acupuncture add massage manipulation with traction has better curative effects than that of manipulation of massage with traction.

关 键 词：针灸 推拿正骨 牵引 腰椎间盘突出症 

分 类 号：R681.55[医药卫生—骨科学]