检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹义昆[1]
机构地区:[1]南京大学哲学系
出 处:《世界宗教研究》2013年第5期13-21,194,共9页Studies in World Religions
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目(批准号:13CZJ001)的阶段成果
摘 要:"把相对化者相对化"是贝格尔从宗教社会学转向神学研究时所提出的一个重要命题。旨在为宗教和神学的超验性特征作出合法性辩护。本文在对这一命题充分解释的基础之上,进一步分析了其与贝格尔神学的关系问题。经由贝格尔为宗教所做辩护的另一条批驳思路——对费尔巴哈宗教投射论所发表的看法为参照,指出:该命题对于贝格尔言,并非像批评者所认为的那样,意味着神学思考要摒弃社会科学的相对化分析,而是要通过对这类分析视角本身的弱点和局限性之揭示,将其从反宗教的世俗意识形态与价值标准的控制之中释放出来,使之成为神学思考方法论上的一个重要前提并予以涵化和超越。本文且指出,这一点,已然成为贝格尔神学思想的特色所在。'relativizing the relativizers' is a significant proposition raised by Peter L.Berger at his academic transformation from the sociological study of religion to his theological exploration.When he did so,he attempted to argue for the legitimacy of transcendental aspects which both religion and theology have.Based on amply-explaining of the proposition,this article further demonstrates its connection with Berger's theological ideas.In terms of another critical approach to defend religion taken by Berger,——precisely,with reference to his own view on Feuerbach's idea of the religion as a projection,this article points out:such proposition does not imply that social sciences should reject the relativizing analysis,just as its critics consider;instead,through the defects and limitations of this analytical perspective revealed,the proposition underlines that theologizing must get such perspective free from the controls of secular anti-religious ideologies as well as standards of value,thus to receive it as a principal premise methodologically,apprehend it intellectually,and to transcend it finally.Moreover,the article also point out:this has become one of the most distinctive characteristics of Berger's theological ideas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112