检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张磊[1] 史中锋[2] 迟阿鲁[2] 赵仲堂[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学研究所,山东济南250012 [2]济南市槐荫区疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《中国卫生事业管理》2013年第10期736-740,共5页Chinese Health Service Management
摘 要:目的:了解社区干预11年城区居民慢性病知信行(KAP)现况及影响因素。方法:采用多阶段抽样方法对济南市≥15岁常住居民进行调查,并进行KAP得分影响因素分析。结果:有效问卷2042份。KAP得分平均(33.35±8.29)分,及格率为55.4%。年龄、性别、文化程度、婚姻、就业状况和人均月收入是KAP得分影响因素。结论:对低文化程度及丧偶居民采取更有针对性的慢性病干预措施。Objectives To explore the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) about chronic diseases and the itffluencing factors among urban residents after I l years' community intervention. Methods Multi-stage sampling method was used to randomly select residents aged 15 and above in Jinan City. Means of KAP scores were compared in residents with different characteristics and logistic regression analysis method was used to filter the influencing factors. Results A total of 2042 valid questionnaires were collected. The results showed that the KAP scores ranged from 3 to 49, with an average of 33.35 + 8.29 and a pass rate of 55. 4%. The pass rates of knowledge,attitude and practice scores were 64.3% ,53.0% and 49.9% , respectively. The total KAP scores were statistically correlated with age ,gender, education level, marital status, employment status and monthly household in- come per capita. Conclusion KAP score was still not ideal. Interventions should be strengthened on residents in low educational level and widowed residents. Author's address School of Public Health,Shandong University. Jinan, P. R. China.
关 键 词:慢性病 社区干预 知识、态度和行为(KAP) 影响因素
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229