检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]铁道第三勘察设计院集团有限公司,天津300142
出 处:《铁道标准设计》2013年第11期59-62,共4页Railway Standard Design
基 金:铁道第三勘察设计院集团有限公司科研项目(721212)
摘 要:现代有轨电车相对于传统老式有轨电车而言,具有多项突出优点。在欧洲,现代有轨电车系统改造利用既有城市桥梁的例子不在少数,而国内还没有现代有轨电车系统改造利用既有城市桥梁的先例。对比中国公路系统与现代有轨电车系统的荷载差异,结果表明二者差距不大;对佛山市南海区新型公共交通系统试验段工程改造利用某既有桥梁的可行性进行了研究。研究结果表明,本文提出的桥面布置方案和改造利用方案是可行的,现代有轨电车系统改造利用中国既有城市桥梁在技术上是可行的。Compared with traditional trams, the modern trams have more outstanding advantages. In Europe, there are many cases of transforming and utilizing the existing city bridge for modern tram system, while there is no precedent of transforming and utilizing the existing city bridge for modern tram system in China. This thesis compared China's highway system with the modern tram system in the aspect of loads, and it shows that there is little difference between them. Moreover, for the test section project of the new-type public transportation system of Nanhai District in Foshan City, this thesis made a feasibility study on transforming and utilizing the existing bridge. The results prove that both the bridge deck's layout scheme and the transforming and utilizing scheme which were suggested by this thesis are all feasible, that is to say, reforming and utilizing the existing city brides of China for the modern tram systems is technically feasible.
分 类 号:U239.5[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104