检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨周[1] 孟景[2] Todd Jackson 陈红[1,3]
机构地区:[1]西南大学心理学部,重庆400715 [2]重庆师范大学教育科学学院,重庆401331 [3]认知与人格教育部重点实验室[西南大学],重庆400715
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2013年第5期768-770,773,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家重点学科基础心理学211工程项目(NSKD11005);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(SWU1309349);国家自然科学基金项目(31371037)
摘 要:目的:验证疼痛恐惧问卷-Ⅲ(The Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III,FPQ-III)在中国大学生中的信效度及其适用性。方法:1061名大学生完成了翻译后的三因素疼痛恐惧问卷,其中71人在四周后重测。结果:探索性因素分析显示疼痛恐惧问卷在中国大学生群体中包括严重疼痛(Severe Pain)、轻微疼痛(Minor Pain)和医疗疼痛(Medical Pain)三个维度。验证性因素分析表明疼痛恐惧问卷-Ⅲ的三因素修正模型具有良好的拟合指标(NFI=0.857,CFI=0.901,NNFI=0.888,SRMR=0.057,RMSEA=0.060)。量表的内部一致性系数为0.93,4周后的重测信度系数为0.82,该量表具有良好的效标效度。结论:疼痛恐惧问卷-Ⅲ在中国大学生中具有良好的信效度。Objective: This research aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-Ⅲ (FPQ-Ⅲ) in Chinese university students. Methods: 1061 students completed the FPQ-Ⅲ and 71 of them were retested after four weeks. Results: The exploratory analysis indicated that there were 3 factors including severe pain, minor pain and medical pain in FPQ-Ⅲ. The confirmatory analysis indicated the 3-factor model fitted well (NFI=0.857, CFI=0.901, NNFI=0.888, SRMR=0.057, RMSEA=O.060). The internal consistency coefficient of the FPQ-III was 0t=0.93, and four weeks later, the retest consistency coefficient was α=0.82. The FPQ-Ⅲ had good criterion validity. Conclusion: FPQ-Ⅲ has good reliability and validity in Chinese undergraduates and can be used to test individual's pain-related fear level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145