检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛弟军[1] 王金明[1] 余济初[1] 丛晓平[1] 于晓平[1]
机构地区:[1]黄石市疾病预防控制中心消杀科,湖北黄石435000
出 处:《中国媒介生物学及控制杂志》2013年第5期467-468,共2页Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control
摘 要:目的探讨粉迹法应用于城市社区室外鼠密度监测的可行性和应用效果。方法同时采用粉迹法和鼠迹法,对黄石市10个社区室外鼠密度进行监测,对监测结果进行统计分析。结果10个社区室外鼠密度监测,粉迹法监测有效粉块率为89.11%,鼠迹阳性率为6.41%;鼠迹法监测结果,路径指数为20.08处/km。将两种方法的监测结果进行相关性分析,差异无统计学意义(r=0.407,P=0.243)。结论选择适宜的天气,粉迹法可应用于城市社区室外鼠密度监测。Objective To investigate the feasibility and application effect of powder trace method in outdoor surveillance of rodent density in urban communities. Methods The powder trace method and rodent trace method were used simultaneously to monitor the outdoor rodent densities in I0 communities of Huangshi, China, and the surveillance results were subjected to statistical analysis. Results The powder trace method showed that the valid powder rate was 89.1 I% and the positive rate of rodent traces was 6.41%. The rodent trace method showed that the path index was 20.08 places/kin. The correlation analysis revealed no significant correlation between the surveillance results of the two methods (r=0.407, P=0.243). Conclusion The powder trace method can be applied for outdoor surveillance of rodent density in urban communities when the weather is favorable.
分 类 号:S443[农业科学—农业昆虫与害虫防治]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145