国内外环境空气质量标准对比分析  

Comparison of environmental air quality standards in China and abroad

作　　者：杨晓波[1] 杨旭峰 李新[3] 

机构地区：[1]成都科技大学环保科技研究所,成都610065 [2]岳池县环境保护局,岳池638300 [3]绵阳师范学院资源环境工程学院,绵阳621000

出　　处：《环保科技》2013年第5期16-19,23,共5页Environmental Protection and Technology

摘　　要：2012年2月,国务院发布新修订GB 3095-2012《环境空气质量标准》,该标准突显较大的进步,对比美国、欧盟、日本、中国香港等国家、地区和组织现行的环境空气质量标准,结果表明,SO2、CO、NO2、O3、PM10和Pb等仍是各国的重点控制污染项目,PM2.5也已经成为各国重点控制项目;中国新标准中一级标准的污染物浓度限值已接近世界大多数发达国家的控制标准,但二级标准还有很大的空间进行更加严格的修订;中国的环境空气质量标准目前采用分级制度进行管理,阻碍了地区控制污染物的均衡发展,建议逐步取消质量标准分级制度。The newly revised Ambient Air Quality Standards （GB3095 -2012） was released in 2012. We compared the in -use ambient air quality standards of China, United States, European U- nion, Japan, Hong Kong and other countries and regions, and found that SO2, CO, NO2, 03, PMI0, Pb, and the new member of PM2.s were the priority pollutants. In the Chinese new standard, the criteria of the first class are close to that of most advanced countries, while the second class is much less strict. China should gradually cancel the grading system of environmental quality standards since it hindered the balance development of pollution control in each regions.

关 键 词：空气 质量标准 对比 中外 

分 类 号：X65[环境科学与工程]