检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药》2013年第11期1603-1604,共2页China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨生理学和手术严重程度评分(POSSUM评分)用于指导老年急腹症患者围术期监测及治疗的价值。方法选取浙江中医药大学附属宁波市中医院106例老年急腹症手术患者,按就诊时期分为2组:A组57例,围术期不评分,仅依据医师经验进行监测与治疗,对病历资料进行回顾性评分;B组49例,在术后立即进行POSSUM评分并依此指导治疗。比较2组术后并发症发生情况和病死率,同时比较所有患者实际并发症发生情况、病死率与评分预测值间的差异。结果所有患者并发症发生率(X^2=6.97,P=0.47)和病死率(X^2=3.27,P=0.39)评分预测值(89.1%、18.7%)与实际值(78.0%、11.1%)差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);而B组术后并发症发生率[30.6%(15/49)]低于A组的[47.4%(27/57)],组间差异有统计学意义(X^2=4.52,P=0.043)。结论POSSUM评分能较好地预示老年急腹症患者手术后并发症和死亡的发生。在其预警下做好围术期治疗,有助于减少术后并发症。Objective To evaluate the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity system for the perioperative monitoring and management of elderly patients with acute abdo- men undergoing resection. Methods In this study, 106 perioperative cases were divided into two groups. Group A was not evaluated by the POSSUM system and managed empirically; group B was recorded by POSSUM immediately at the end of operation and managed accordingly. Postoperative morbidity and mortality was compared between the two groups. Results All patients complication rate (X^2 = 6.97, P = 0.47 ) and mortality (X^2 = 3.27, P = 0.39) score predictive value (89.1%, 18.7%) and the actual value (78.0%, 11.1%) showed no statistical signifi- cance ( P 〉 0.05 ) ; the incidence of postoperative complications in group B ( 30.6% ) was lowere than that in group A (47. 4% ); there were statistically significant difference between two groups (X^2 = 4. 52, P = 0. 043 ). Conclusion The POSSUM methodology allows satisfactory prediction of mortality and morbidity rates in elderly pa- tients with acute abdomen undergoing resection.
关 键 词:急腹症 围术期 生理学和手术严重程度评分
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.237.71