检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连民族学院东北少数民族研究院,辽宁大连116600
出 处:《大连大学学报》2013年第5期27-33,共7页Journal of Dalian University
摘 要:长期以来,日本国内对钓鱼岛的历史观,主要分两大派,一派从狭隘利己主义出发,不顾历史事实,认为钓鱼岛是日本"固有领土";另一派是从历史唯物论出发,尊重历史事实,认为钓鱼岛是中国最早发现的,是中国领土。日本政府"购买"钓鱼岛的活动,破坏了中日两国所达成的"搁置争议"的共识。日本应该端正历史观,重视友好,展开谈判,以缓和矛盾,进而公平合理地解决钓鱼岛争端。There have been mainly two different historical viewpoints of the Diaoyu Islands in Japan: One is from narrow self-interest to remain obdurate and pervert the truth, saying that the Diaoyu Islands are "inherent territory" of Japan; the other is from historical materialism to respect facts and history, believing that the Diaoyu Islands were originally discovered by China and have consequently become Chinese territory. Japan's unlawful "purchase" of China's Diaoyu Islands has destroyed the consensus of "putting the disputes aside" reached be- tween the two countries. It is considered that Japan should correct its historicM viewpoint, attach importance to friendship, and go on negotiations, in order to dissolve contradictions and to solve the dispute over the Diaoyu Islands fairly and reasonably.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229